🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.