🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing damages totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move constitutes a direct response by the Kremlin against plans to use immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and financial stability.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear refused to comment on the new lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are developing steps to deter other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be required to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a clear message that if you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."